The U.S. Senate has voted down a treaty that opponents warned could widen acceptance of abortion, deny the parents of special needs children their rights, and compromise U.S. sovereignty.Whenever a UN treaty comes up for ratification I'm always concerned about the broader ramifications. This proposed treaty is another case in point.
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) failed to be ratified after a 61-38 vote.
“Today’s vote was a victory for human rights and for American sovereignty,” said Austin Ruse, president of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, an organization that testified against the treaty.
Article 25 of the CRPD called on nations to furnish the disabled “free or affordable health care…including in the area of sexual and reproductive health and population-based public health programmes.” Pro-life leaders warned that language could be interpreted to include abortion, as it has in the case of other UN treaties.
“The irony of including abortion in this treaty is that abortion especially targets the disabled in the womb,” Josh Craddock, international representative for Personhood USA, said in a statement e-mailed to LifeSiteNews.com. “Persons with disabilities should not be exposed to violence and discrimination, either before or after birth.”
Commentary on pro-family issues in the media, politics and in the public square.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Disabilities treaty implicating parental rights, abortion, and US sovereignty defeated in US Senate
Efforts to pass a treaty dealing with disabilities was defeated in the US Senate by a 61 to 36 vote. They needed 67 votes to pass it. Concerns were raised over abortion, parental rights and US sovereignty.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment